Has Facebook Really Lost its Users?

facebookIf you’ve been doing your rounds of the social media news then you’ve already seen the influx of stories that Facebook has been loosing users by the droves with some claiming it’s as much at 10 million users in the US. I was taken aback by the numbers in these posts I was seeing so I decided to do some digging of my own. I had a look at the quarterly report published by Facebook to their investors and this is what they said about their number of users:

First Quarter 2013 Facebook Operational Highlights

Daily active users (DAUs) were 665 million on average for March 2013, an increase of 26% year-over-year.
Monthly active users (MAUs) were 1.11 billion as of March 31, 2013, an increase of 23% year-over-year.
Mobile MAUs were 751 million as of March 31, 2013, an increase of 54% year-over-year.

Facebook currently has 195 million users in the US alone, that’s over 50% of the total US population! Yes, it is true that Facebook has seen a drop in unique visitors from March 2012 to March 2013, this is a drop from 152.8 million to 142.1 million unique hits, and this is where so many bloggers got their 10 million figure from for those eye catching headlines. But as Benjamin Disraeli once famously said, “There are 3 kinds of lies in the world; lies, damned lies and statistics”. So looking at the data it is evident that these losses are strictly on the desktop site, if you look at the mobile user numbers you see a ridiculous spike from 62 million to 99 million in the same time frame. So the truth of the matter is that Facebook hasn’t actually lost 10 million users, they have in fact gained 26.3 million users.

This goes with the trend I spoke about in my last post about Facebook (here) about the rise of mobile users to access the page and how Facebook is using that information to target more and better ads towards mobile users and how that’s actually working. But this piece isn’t about that, it’s about those bloggers and writers who write posts without doing proper research on a topic, or hide the true information to reach their desired conclusion. I have and will always speak out against false sensationalist headlines and those who perpetrate them. We might not work for the New York Times but we do have an obligation to give you, the reader, the best possible information and the most informed opinion on a subject.


  1. After study several of the blogs for your site now, and i genuinely appreciate your way of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark internet site list and will also be checking back soon. Pls look at my web page as well and figure out what you believe.

  2. Excellent info and straight to the true point. I don at find out if that is truly the best place to question but can you folks have any ideea where to get some qualified consultants? Thanks beforehand

  3. Functions anyone obtained any real success through HARO? It simply feels that most of the reporters installed on the organization are usually from the united states which are deprived of much anticipations from other international locations particularly within South Asia. Brian, can you really main me to any scenario studies? Thanks.

  4. 854156 663519If you are needing to produce alteration in an individuals llife, during i would say the Are usually Bodyweight peeling off pounds training course are a wide path in the direction of gaining any search. la weight loss 33768

  5. 994790 676485Can I basically say exactly what a relief to get someone who actually knows what theyre dealing with on the internet. You really know how to bring a difficulty to light and make it essential. The diet ought to see this and fully grasp this side on the story. I cant believe youre not far more common because you undoubtedly hold the gift. 903357


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here